DEBATING THE DEBATES
CBS News
Jarrett Murphy
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
The most powerful man in the world
and the person running to replace him will not be allowed to bring charts
to their debate on Thursday. They cannot ask each other questions or propose
pledges. They may not challenge one another to additional debates.
President Bush and Sen. John Kerry may, however, "take notes during the
debate on the size, color and type of paper each prefers and using the
type of pen or pencil that each prefers." That's according to the rules
set out in a memorandum signed by both presidential campaigns to govern
the four debates that may well decide the 2004 election.
The rules cover everything from the sublime (neither candidate can use
a device "to create an impression of elevated height") to the substantive
(if audience members at the town hall debate ask a question different
from the one approved by the moderator, their microphone could be cut
off). And they are why some critics say the way debates are run these
days is debatable.
"You're really not watching a debate. You're watching a glorified, bipartisan
press conference," said George Farah, an advocate for debate reform and
author of "No Debate," a book critical of modern debates.
The 2004 debates are the fifth set of sessions overseen by the Commission
on Presidential Debates, a group started by the respective heads of the
Democratic and Republican parties.
Paul Kirk and Frank Fahrenkopf, the onetime Democratic and GOP chairmen,
still chair the debate commission, but Fahrenkopf, in an interview, said
the parties have no control over the body.
The commission was launched after the 1984 election, in which the League
of Woman Voters ran debates as they had in 1976 and 1980. The campaigns
of Walter Mondale and Ronald Reagan shot down more than 90 reporters whom
the League suggested for the debate panel. According to Fahrenkopf, that
dispute illustrated the need for change.
Two independent studies conducted after the 1984 election recommended
"that an independent body be created that exists for one purpose and one
purpose only, and that is to conduct general election debates every four
years," he said.
When the campaigns of George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis agreed in 1988
to debate rules that, among other things, prohibited their questioning
one another and put the commission in charge of two of three debates,
the League withdrew its sponsorship for the meeting in Los Angeles.
Fahrenkopf claims the League pulled out because "they didn't have the
money to finance what they were going to do in Los Angeles." But the League
claimed a more substantive objection.
"We have no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the
American public," League president Nancy Neuman said at the time. "The
candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign
trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to
tough questions."
Critics today voice the same complaints about the current debate set-up,
which is outlined in a 32-page memorandum negotiated by the Bush and Kerry
campaigns with the commission's input.
In addition to the previously mentioned restrictions, the rules also limit
the amount of time for discussion. A candidate who is asked a question
has two minutes to answer; his opponent then has 90 seconds to respond.
Then it is up to the moderator to decide whether discussion can continue.
In the "town hall" style debate, audience members cannot ask questions
that haven't been approved in advance and cannot ask follow-up questions.
The rules, said Farah, create "a sort of sanitized debate format in which
the candidates cannot talk to each other."
The restrictions on candidates are compounded, Farah said, by the move
to a single moderator format, rather than allowing questions from a panel
of journalists.
Panelists once included such diverse voices as conservative Fred Barnes
and pioneering black journalist Robert Maynard. But in the past two cycles,
PBS' Jim Lehrer has moderated six of the seven debates on his own. Except
in the town hall debates, the questions Lehrer asks, he has said, are
his alone.
A spokesman for the PBS NewsHour said Lehrer would not speak to the media
prior to the debates.
Fahrenkopf said the move to a single moderator was intended to promote
follow-up questions. Reporters on panels would rather ask a question of
their own than a follow-up question, Fahrenkopf said, even when a follow-up
is warranted.
A desire to get a diversity of voices led the commission to recommend
different moderators for each of this year's four debates, Fahrenkopf
said.
The debates' funding is also a target for critics. Unable to take money
from the parties or the candidates, the debate commission has a number
of corporate underwriters, from American Airlines to JetBlue Airways.
"The people running the corporations know that giving to the debate commission
is kind of giving to two parties simultaneously," Farah said. "They show
up at parties afterwards and rub elbows with the campaign managers."
According to IRS records, the commission received $5 million in donations
in 2000 and about $2.3 million in 1996. Smaller amounts are recorded in
the non-presidential election years. While the names of the contributors
are blocked out, records show that three entities gave $500,000 each in
1996 alone.
"These people get nothing," Fahrenkopf said, insisting he is comfortable
with the corporate role.
In addition to their concerns about how debates are run and funded, critics
also oppose the exclusion of third party candidates.
While Ross Perot and his Reform Party running mate Admiral James Stockdale
appeared in the 1992 debates, Ralph Nader was barred not only from participating
in the 2000 debates but also from even entering the events.
The commission says it applies an objective formula to decide whether
candidates can participate: In addition to being on enough ballots to
be eligible to win the presidency, they must attain an average of 15 percent
support in five national polls.
The Federal Election Commission dismissed complaints from Nader, Pat Buchanan
and other third party candidates about their exclusion from the 2000 debates.
In August, a federal district judge ordered that the FEC reinvestigate
those complaints.
"We're always sued. We're sued every cycle," said Fahrenkopf, who argues
that complaints about the role of major party candidates in shaping debates
fail to realize that debating is a voluntary activity.
"There's nothing that says these people have to debate. There's no rule
that they have to debate," he said.
Farah does see some progress. For one thing, this year marks the first
time that the campaigns have released their debate agreement to the public.
Another plus is that the campaigns accepted the commission's proposal
of four different moderators.
|